Research Stream: Examining Presentation Manager: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
NCommander (talk | contribs) |
NCommander (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* How does Borland Sidekick compare between DOS and Windows? | * How does Borland Sidekick compare between DOS and Windows? | ||
* How is Presentation Manager at handling running multiple console sessions at once? | * How is Presentation Manager at handling running multiple console sessions at once? | ||
* Is Presentation Manager an upgrade over the TSHELL interface? | |||
== Interesting Timestamps == | == Interesting Timestamps == | ||
Revision as of 22:29, 15 January 2023
 | |
| Presentation Manager | |
|---|---|
| VoD Link | N/A |
| Streamed On | N/A |
| Streamed by | NCommander |
| Stream type | Emulated on 86Box |
Description
Rationale
Sidekick
Borland Sidekick was a very popular TSR for handling data, and it was also one of the first available Presentation Manager applications.[1] The direct comparison allows to show how the GUI did or didn't improve things ...
Questions Asked and Answered
These were questions I wrote down and asked before doing the stream to try and answer them, and my collected feelings over them.
- How does Windows 2.x compare Presentation Manager in OS/2 1.1?
- How does Borland Sidekick compare between DOS and Windows?
- How is Presentation Manager at handling running multiple console sessions at once?
- Is Presentation Manager an upgrade over the TSHELL interface?